<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>72Kilowatts Internet Marketing - Latest Comments in It&amp;#8217;s not just Trademark Poaching</title><link>http://72kilowattsaffiliatemarketing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:16:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not just Trademark Poaching</title><link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/05/22/its-not-just-trademark-poaching/#comment-511406</link><description>Often too, they call it Trademark bidding when in fact they haven't trademarked the terms, much less prohibited it in writing.  That's actually a separate issue :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">72kilowatts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not just Trademark Poaching</title><link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/05/22/its-not-just-trademark-poaching/#comment-511369</link><description>Yeah, the use of the term 'trademark' in 'trademark poaching' implies trademark abuse.  It just happens that trademarks are the most commonly restricted terms.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've even seen examples where merchants are angered by trademark bidding, but they haven't disallowed those actions in their bidding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps the proper term is 'Restricted Keyword Poaching' or maybe just 'Keyword Poaching'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandverity</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>